Behind vine-covered partitions on a modest hill overlooking Sundown Boulevard sits the decidedly conceited Chateau Marmont. The lodge was impressed by a French Gothic fortress and, at 93, it’s simply the oldest factor in Los Angeles that’s nonetheless thought of horny.
As a born-and-raised New Yorker and not using a driver’s license, I discovered the lodge the proper place to park myself for a day of conferences within the period earlier than Ubers and WeWorks and Soho Homes. I used to go there within the 2000s, again once I was a marriage planner. It was like a celeb safari; stars would stroll by, inside arm’s attain. You may “do Los Angeles” with out ever needing to maneuver. I by no means might have afforded a room there, however I knew by repute that at night time it provided leisure of a distinct kind: luxurious and licentiousness and debauchery, unbounded by any guidelines.
In more moderen years, I’ve returned to Los Angeles in a distinct profession—as a screenwriter touring on another person’s dime. Naturally, I didn’t need to simply take conferences on the Chateau; I wished to remain there, to be a fly on the wall the place the wild issues had been. Solely I couldn’t.
I used to be instructed, in early 2021, that the lodge was not taking any new bookings. Throughout the pandemic, a dispute between the proprietor and the workers had exploded, spectacularly. The lodge was now working with a skeleton crew; staff had been on strike, making an attempt to prepare a union. Even some celebrities had been boycotting it.
The debauchery the Chateau was identified for got here at a value. After a large spherical of pandemic-related layoffs, staff began speaking, publicly, about what they’d skilled on the job, and the tales had been gross. Allegations included maids being pressured to deal with used drug syringes, workers members being cajoled by poolside friends to lotion them up, sexts and slurs and relentless sexual propositions from colleagues or friends. (A spokesperson for the corporate instructed me that “the Chateau vigorously objects” to those allegations.)
The Chateau Marmont opened in 1929 and from its earliest days was referred to as a discreet playground for the wealthy and well-known. “In the event you should get into bother, accomplish that on the Marmont,” the studio mogul Harry Cohn is rumored to have instructed his greatest stars. Marilyn Monroe and Arthur Miller made love there; Lindsay Lohan lived there; John Belushi died there.
In 1990, André Balazs bought the property and started restoring it along with his ex-wife. The son of educational Hungarian immigrants, Balazs made his fortune in biotech earlier than turning his consideration to nightlife and hospitality and opening a sequence of lodges and personal golf equipment. “All good lodges have a tendency to steer folks to do issues they wouldn’t essentially do at dwelling” is one in every of his extensively quoted bon mots. The Chateau is thought for catering to regulars, lots of whom arrive exactly to do the form of partying they wouldn’t do at dwelling.
In some ways, the lodge operated like a very-high-end mom-and-pop enterprise, lengthy functioning with out company vultures lurking for earnings studies, in-house authorized groups wringing their fingers over the chance of litigation, or a completely practical HR division. Its final full-time HR director left in 2017 and was by no means formally changed.
For years, the employees’ grievances racked up. In a serious exposé, The Hollywood Reporter described complaints from housekeeping of quick staffing and sordid events to wash up after. Entrance-of-house staff stated they’d skilled undesirable sexual advances from friends and colleagues alike. Ethnic slurs had been reportedly hurled with regularity at Latino kitchen workers by administration. Black and Latino staff stated that they had been back-burnered for the most effective shifts and promotions—allegations corroborated by their white colleagues. (In a press release to me, the spokesperson rejected all of those allegations and known as them “unsupported.”)
Then, in March 2020, on the daybreak of the pandemic, Balazs laid off all however 9 of the lodges’ 259 staff—with out severance or respectable well being advantages. Many had been in his service for years. Although I didn’t get to talk with Balazs immediately, in a press release he stated he noticed the choice to chop right down to a “‘caretaker’ workers” as obligatory “due to the world-wide Covid 19 state of affairs and my perspective of its doubtless length.” The laid-off staff noticed it in a different way. The transfer amplified murmurs about unionization, murmurs that grew louder that summer time after Balazs introduced to The Wall Avenue Journal a plan to transform the lodge into a non-public membership, one served by workers with a “totally different ability set” from the outdated lodge staff’. Enterprise publications interpreted this as a COVID-related pivot, however staff—and plenty of others—speculated that it was an try to undermine the union effort. (The spokesperson instructed me that the personal membership was by no means “greater than an idea.”)
A film and a TV present had been being filmed on the Chateau: Being the Ricardos and The Supply. Beneath stress from Unite Right here 11, the 32,000-member hospitality staff’ union that was representing Chateau staff, each moved manufacturing elsewhere. The celebrities had been divided (even though most of them—Hollywood being a union city—belong to unions). Some, resembling Amanda Seyfried and Issa Rae, boycotted the lodge. Others appeared oblivious or selected to not care; Jay-Z threw an Oscars after-party there final 12 months, which celeb scabs together with Questlove and Rosario Dawson crossed a picket line to attend. (“I didn’t cross a picket line,” Dawson, underneath hearth, later tweeted—apparently wanting folks to know that she’d arrived so late to the celebration that many of the protesters had gone dwelling.)
Studying concerning the staff’ grievances, I felt outraged on their behalf. However I used to be skeptical that unionization might remodel their office. The Chateau just isn’t a Vacation Inn; it’s a luxurious boutique lodge. The Chateau doesn’t simply supply rooms for friends to sleep in; it presents, as Balazs has put it, “experiences”—experiences which may, I suspected, be basically at odds with a greater atmosphere for staff. Company have been drawn to the Chateau over the many years much less by the thread depend within the bedding and the expansive wine record than by the seductions of a spot that turned a blind eye to social transgressions.
In that Hollywood Reporter exposé, one common anonymously described the Chateau as “this bizarre beast that form of slipped by and shouldn’t exist as it’s, but it surely does. However in the event you had been to say, ‘It wants higher HR and correct compliances and codes and egalitarianism on the door,’ it loses its contact.” When briefed on the workers’s troubles, a enterprise affiliate of the lodge instructed the paper, “I’m reconsidering the Chateau by means of a very totally different lens now. All the speak of it being a ‘playground,’ of it exalting ‘privateness.’ It actually was only a system that protected white males in energy.”
In that gentle, the query for me turned: Can debauchery and decency co-exist? Can luxurious accommodate honest labor practices and nonetheless really feel luxurious?
From private expertise, I had my doubts.
Owning a luxurious service enterprise of any sort will be ethically and emotionally difficult. It strains what you consider is suitable habits to tolerate at work, and what must be tolerated with a view to flip a revenue. I’ll always remember the primary time I questioned the course that my skilled life had taken. I used to be beneath a princess-waist Vera Wang robe, serving to my consumer hoist up the skirt in order that she might pee, when I discovered myself at eye stage with the phrases Meet Mrs. Cohen, written in cursive blue-Swarovski crystal throughout her underpants. I swallowed the second, figuring out that this service was the “above and past” that my clientele anticipated.
I had a tougher time justifying this type of soiled work once I needed to ask different folks to do it. Through the years, our workers members had been instructed to, amongst different issues, smoke cigarettes and exhale into brides’ faces (so the brides wouldn’t should smoke themselves and spoil their lipstick), stroll canines, maintain infants, dance with fathers/brothers/groomsmen, take photographs, cowl up infidelities, cowl up relapses, purchase alcohol, purchase medication, set off fireworks, and put out literal fires. There was verbal abuse, undesirable sexual advances, and wild, drunken accusations. (There have been additionally some very good folks; you cling to the recollections of the very good folks.)
Relying by myself exhaustion stage, I heard workers members’ complaints with both horror or indifference. This was, in spite of everything, a part of the job of being in “luxurious hospitality.” My companion and I attempted, as finest as attainable, to insulate our staff by including behavioral clauses to our contracts: Thou shalt not curse at workers; thou shall not grope workers; thou shalt not pressure workers to smoke in your behalf.
However primarily, we did what folks used to do within the good outdated days: We threw cash on the drawback. We’d try to, throughout the bounds of profitability, make it value our workers’s whereas to tolerate the abuse they endured whereas we saved saying sure to our purchasers’ whims. As a result of that’s what the posh service enterprise is all about.
However over time, the wealthy received richer, and their habits appeared to worsen. I started to marvel if listening to sure was not sufficient. Was figuring out that the individuals who served you had to say sure an important a part of the enjoyable?
André Balazs could be very explicit about his glassware—specifically, about whether or not the shatterproof glasses used close to his pool really feel as luxurious as actual glass. I do know this not as a result of I’ve ever met and even spoken to Balazs, however as a result of I’ve deliberate a number of lavish weddings for choose purchasers to whom he would hire his former personal property in upstate New York. By way of many individuals—his home managers, his private chef, company executives from André Balazs Properties—Balazs made his preferences, opinions, and, in equity, considerations for our purchasers’ happiness and satisfaction identified. No element was too small.
So once I heard, in December, that the lodge had struck a cope with the union, I knew that Balazs will need to have micromanaged each element. However I used to be shocked once I learn that the ensuing contract was fairer and extra beneficiant than anybody within the luxury-hotel enterprise might have imagined.
Among the many staff’ victories had been a 25 p.c wage improve for nontipped staff; a increase to $25 an hour for housekeeping inside one 12 months; well being protection for workers who work greater than 60 hours a month; free authorized companies for workers with immigration, tenant, or client points; and job-protection measures for immigrant staff with Deferred Motion for Childhood Arrivals or Short-term Protected Standing. Union representatives known as the package deal “unprecedented.” And the spokesperson instructed me that lots of the laid-off staff have since returned to the lodge.
After years of acrimony, how had such a seemingly unbridgeable hole been closed?
Balazs has by no means had a choir boy’s repute. The bachelor made headlines for years along with his regular rotation of celeb love pursuits. A 2020 Tatler article described his life as “deliciously naughty,” noting his dedication to delivering “extra” to his friends and his repute for “outrageous flirting.” Maybe too outrageous. The actor Amanda Anka accused him of groping her in 2014, after the opening of Horrible Bosses 2. After the incident, Anka’s husband, Jason Bateman, spat in Balazs’s face.
However Balazs was apparently shaken by his staff’ fees, particularly of racial discrimination. He felt that they had been basically at odds with who he was.
“André’s lived a life dedicated to social justice from his faculty years and all through his grownup life,” Neil Getnick, a lawyer specializing in whistleblower illustration and one in every of Balazs’s oldest associates, instructed me. Getnick serves because the business-integrity counsel for Balazs’s properties. He additionally represented Balazs on the bargaining desk.
Getnick and Balazs met at Cornell within the late ’70s when Getnick, a legislation scholar, and Balazs, an undergraduate working at a scholar newspaper, collectively lobbied the college to divest from apartheid-era South Africa. The ’90s, Getnick instructed me, discovered him and Balazs collaborating once more, this time with the Reverend Jesse Jackson to free the Kenyan political prisoner Koigi wa Wamwere—one other Cornell classmate. Later, the 2 associates established a scholarship in Kenya with, Getnick stated, the help of Congressman John Lewis. For some time Balazs was an investor in a New York nightclub known as M.Okay.—“so known as,” he stated in an interview, “as a result of we obtained the license on Martin Luther King Day.”
In the future a couple of 12 months in the past, protesters exterior the Chateau had been joined by pastors and choir singers from close by church buildings. Balazs, Getnick instructed me, discovered that “an excessive amount of to bear,” and he went right down to the picket line.
Pastor William D. Good Jr., the president of the Southern Christian Management Convention of Southern California, noticed Balazs, and approached him. He later instructed me concerning the dialog: “We stated, ‘Everybody needs to speak to you and attempt to resolve these points.’” Good recalled Balazs responding, “Properly, you don’t know me, however I’m not the man that they’re portray me out to be.”
A gathering was organized. Getnick, Balazs, and union representatives convened for the primary time, with Pastor Good serving as mediator. However negotiations stalled; there was no follow-up. Early on Pentecost Sunday, Good sat down to jot down his sermon, and was moved to name Balazs.
He instructed me that he requested Balazs, “The place have you ever been? What’s occurring? We began one thing; you’re not ending it.” And Balazs replied, “Properly, there’s no excuse,” and bingo: “He made the dedication on that Sunday name that he would meet; he would begin the method.” Six months later, that they had a deal.
This, Getnick stated, “was under no circumstances typical of how these negotiations would sometimes proceed.” Which, after all, is how you’d anticipate one thing to go down at Chateau Marmont.
I want to assume that the settlement will function a mannequin for different luxurious companies—and definitely the lodge business is watching—however I’m skeptical. Sure, the dogged dedication of staff and organizers is what introduced injustices at Chateau Marmont to gentle. However this pleased ending in the end relied on the whims of 1 very rich man. One who—fortunately—occurred to be a Boomer with a delicate spot for clergymen, Martin Luther King Jr., and the Southern Christian Management Congress. Yesterday, Jeff Bezos wished to be a media mogul; as we speak, a sports activities impresario. This complete factor might have simply gone a distinct approach.
I additionally couldn’t assist questioning how a lot the contract will change staff’ expertise on the job. They’re better-compensated; they’ve retirement advantages and different protections. However the settlement does little to protect them from entitled or inebriated friends. It did what I used to do: It threw cash on the drawback.
This morning on the Chateau there’ll nonetheless be vomit to wash up from final night time’s rager. Tonight, or the following, there’ll nonetheless be ass grabs by Hollywood honchos. I’m undecided whether or not a terrific place for the rich can ever be a terrific place for many who serve them. In a enterprise the place the important thing phrase is sure, unions can police employers, however the entire level of a luxurious expertise is that nobody polices the friends.
